Showing posts with label grimm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label grimm. Show all posts

30 August, 2011

New Fall TV Show Death Pool


It's almost that time of the year again, when the networks roll out their new stable of shows. Basically, it's like throwing shit at the wall to see what will stick. The truth is most are already dead shows walking.

I thought I'd make it interesting and pick which newbies are the top five candidates to meet the axe. You know, become this year's Lone Star, Undercovers, Shit My Dad Says, or The Event. It's not a science, I'm just going with my gut. Well, unless the show is on NBC, where chances are it will automatically fail (I keed, I keed, NOT). So here goes, let's play reaper!

1. THE PLAYBOY CLUB (Mondays 10/9c NBC)
NBC's attempt at MAD MEN style period drama will most definitely crash and burn. It's already surrounded by controversy, and it has a tough time slot. It may have The Sing-Off as a lead in, but it will finish a distant third in it's time slot against Castle (ABC) and Hawaii-0 (CBS).
Prediction: The controversy and viewers' curiosity will give it decent premiere numbers but it will plummet quickly and get pulled before it's inital 13 episodes have all aired.

2. GRIMM (Fridays 9/8c NBC):
Out of the gate, the chips are stacked against it. Sure the premise might be interesting, a Grimm's Fairy Tales inspired cop show. But it's target audience is pretty much spoken for. It's going up against two established genre shows Fringe and Supernatural. Did I mention it's on NBC.
Prediction: 13 and out.

3. CHARLIE'S ANGELS (Thursdays ABC)
Another remake could lead to viewer fatigue. The hotness that is Minka Kelly will not be enough to save the show. It is in a very tough time slot up against "The Big Bang Theory" and "The X Factor" results show.
Prediction: Will get a back 9, get a time slot change but will not be able to fend off it's cancellation in May.

4. WHITNEY (Thursdays 9:30/8:30c NBC)
This year's Outsourced. It's being protected by The Office but that is not a gimme anymore. It is yet to be determined how well a Carell free Office will perform. That will determine how long it will stave off the reaper. Regardless, it's premise seems boring: a young couple relationship comedy. Been there done that.
Prediction: Possibly a back 9, but then it's off to never never land next spring.

5. PAN AM (Sundays 10/9 c ABC)
ABC's attempt to cash in on the MAD MEN craze. A period night time soap that MIGHT play well. It's time slot against Sunday Night Football (NBC) in the fall and established veteran CSI: Miami (CBS) will likely hurt it's chances of survival. But then I may be wrong.
Prediction: A full 22 episode season and buh bye.

If you're interested in the entire crop of new shows check out TV Guide's list here. Come back and let me know which ones you think will meet their early demise.



CLICK TO READ THIS ARTICLE

19 July, 2011

Watch or Skip? Next Season in Geek Pilots


Writer: MediaSavant

It took me a while, but I’ve seen most of the geek-oriented pilots for the next broadcast season. When it comes to watching shows in the sci-fi or fantasy genres, I usually try to give them all a chance. Unless it really turns me off, I also try to watch more than one episode because sometimes these kinds of shows don’t their real legs until halfway through the first season.

But, those are best intentions. Limited time and competition from returning series favorites often leads me to having to prioritize and not get around to watching everything.

I’m not a reviewer and I can only give my general reactions to the pilots I’ve seen. I decided to estimate the probability I’ll actually watch the 2nd episode of any of these shows.

Awake (NBC mid-season)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—100%

Very different. It’s about a guy who survived a car accident and is living in two realities. In one, his wife died, but his son survived. In the other, his son died, but his wife survived. This is very psychological, but I found myself very intrigued by the dilemma he’s in.

Alcatraz (Fox mid-season)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—100%

Cast includes Lost’s Jorge Garcia and comes from the JJ Abrams company. It isn’t perfect, but I’m interested in the mystery they’ve set up regarding why a group of prisoners disappeared from Alcatraz and why they are coming back.

The River (ABC mid-season)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—95%

This one comes from the same team that did Paranormal Activity. It uses a documentary filming technique and is scary at times. It concerns a group of filmmakers and a family looking for a missing explorer somewhere in South America. I wonder if is sustainable as a series. But, I’ll probably watch the next few episodes.

Grimm (NBC)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—50%

At this point, my interest in the new series drops. The premise of this series is that all the Grimm Fairy Tales were real and a modern cop discovers his legacy is to battle various baddies. The pilot was merely okay. It struck me as something the Syfy Channel might do. It will be up against Fringe. The casting of the lead isn’t that great.

Person of Interest (CBS)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—40%

This is the other JJ Abrams' show with a former Lost actor (Michael Emerson). The reason this one lost my interest is that it also stars Jim Caviezel, who I find very low on charisma. The fancy set-up about a machine that spies on everyone and spits out social security numbers of people who may be in trouble only leads us to what will be really another CBS procedural.

Ringer (CW)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—37%

The only reason I’ve listed this here is that it stars Sarah Michele Gellar and is generating some interest for their panel at San Diego Comic-con. It’s not really science fiction or fantasy. SMG plays twins. One twin takes over the other twin’s life after that twin's death so that she can run away from the mob (or something). SMG is miscast in both roles. I found the techniques used to get them in the same scenes together distracting. I only MAY watch the 2nd episode just to see if it gets any better.

Once Upon a Time (ABC)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—35%

What’s with the fascination with Fairy Tales this year? It’s similar to Grimm in that the main character is also in law enforcement (loosely) and discovers they are someone they didn’t know they were. I just didn’t get into it much.

The Secret Circle (CW)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—0%

Teenage witches based on books by the same author as Vampire Diaries. If you watch Vampire Diaries, you may like this. I don’t watch Vampire Diaries.

A Gifted Man
Chance of watching 2nd episode—0%

A gifted man played by an actor who specializes in playing good-looking bland people (Patrick Wilson). I got very distracted watching it. It’s on at 8PM ET Friday. Watch Chuck instead.

Terra Nova (Fox)
Chance of watching 2nd episode—TBD

The only genre pilot I didn’t receive. They are showing it at Comic-con. I’ll try to see it there.

CLICK TO READ THIS ARTICLE

12 July, 2011

Ad Agencies Predict next season's ratings


Writer: MediaSavant

The June 27th, 2011 issue of Advertising Age had a chart of predictions of Household ratings for next season on the major broadcast networks.

The predictions reflect C3 ratings and were averaged from submissions by media agencies—these are agencies that plan and buy media campaigns for advertisers. A “C3” rating is the rating that programs get during commercial minutes within three days of airing. C3 ratings are the currency on which advertising costs are based. They are most similar in size to Live + SD ratings, but rarely exactly the same.

You might be interested in how several geek shows fared in these predictions.

Person of Interest: 7.09
Castle: 5.55
Glee: 4.39 (included because they are at SDCC next week)
Terra Nova: 4.11
A Gifted Man: 3.83
Alcatraz: 3.75
Family Guy: 3.73
The River (mid-season): 3.30
Grimm: 2.30
Awake (mid-season): 2.2
Fringe: 2.16
Community: 1.97
Chuck: 1.97
Vampire Diaries: 1.27
Supernatural: 1.11
The Secret Circle: 1.05
Nikita: 1.01
Ringer 0.76 (included because its Sarah Michele Gellar and at SDCC)

It should be noted that because these are household ratings, shows that tend to have older audiences usually do very well.

Chuck fans may wonder how the predicted 1.97 for Friday at 8PM compares to Monday last season. It’s quite a drop. Chuck’s season 4 finale episode scored a 2.6 Live + SD household rating. Chuck’s replacement on Monday—The Sing-Off—is predicted to get a 3.4, which is higher than Chuck got last 4th quarter (3.2 average).

The “Person of Interest” prediction appears to be quite high to me. I’ve seen that pilot and wasn’t that enamored with it. I’m just not a Jim Caviezel fan. But, CBS claims it “tested well” and it gets CSI’s old timeslot. Everything else in the timeslot skews younger. So, maybe it will do well with the older folk.

If there are any other questions about what’s listed here, please comment below.


CLICK TO READ THIS ARTICLE

01 June, 2011

Is Sci-Fi TV on Friday Good or Bad?


Geek TV fandom seems to have split opinions when it comes to their shows running on Fridays. On the one hand, the phrase “Friday death slot” gets thrown around. There are not-so-fond memories of shows such as Firefly, Sarah Connor Chronicles, and Dollhouse being put on Friday and not exactly thriving.

On the other hand, there’s the opinion demonstrated by Gateworld.net’s Darren Sumner. Darren wrote a piece in early May called “How wrestling is Killing Science Fiction”.

Original series such as Farscape, the first two Stargates, and Battlestar Galactica once dominated Syfy’s Friday schedule and did pretty well for themselves—by the network’s standards at the time, anyway. Then, Syfy acquired the rights to WWE Smackdown with its own large Friday night fanbase. Putting said wrestling on Friday cut into the network’s use of the night for original scripted shows.

Darren’s argument was that wrestling is so strong that it can survive on other nights, but science fiction shows need Friday. His request was for Syfy to move wrestling to another night and give the night back to science fiction shows.

So, is Friday a “death slot” or a safe haven?

There’s no doubt that one of the reasons that genre shows got put on Fridays over the years is the theory that geeks don’t go out on Friday. I don’t know if that is or isn’t true. I know I go out. Over the years, I’ve relied on my VCR and DVR to allow me to have a social life and see Friday shows later.

For the population at large, Adult 18-49 live TV usage is much lower on Friday. As I was contemplating the ratings impact of Chuck’s move to Friday this Fall, I found that Live TV viewing at 8PM is 17% lower on Friday than Mondays. It’s 15% lower at 9PM and 10% lower at 10PM.

So, right off the bat, you are dealing with fewer available viewers than on other nights. The counter-balancing element is that there is less competition on Friday. Networks do not put their strongest shows on Friday. When they do get a high-rated show on Friday, they move it pretty quickly. Many people don’t remember that juggernaut CSI began on Friday, was a hit, and got moved to Thursday pretty quickly.

My focus is on live viewing because the most important thing people need to know about ratings now is that the only rating that matters is the “C3” rating. “C3” is the rating that the average commercial minute gets in a program within three days of it airing. A few years ago, advertisers got their decades-old wish to pay for the ad time based on an estimate of who watches the commercials rather than who watches the show. They have a point. If you were an advertiser, you wouldn’t want to pay more than you have to either.

While genre fans love the DVR, I think part of the ratings problem genre shows have began when Nielsen started to include it in the ratings. It’s popular for the “commonfolk” to bitch about Nielsen, but it was Nielsen’s development of new technology to measure DVR viewing that added a new challenge for genre shows. Their technological advancement in developing the “C3” rating added more to the problem. When the VCR was the dominant time-shifting tool, the technology only existed to measure what people recorded, but not what they played back. So, the industry did something that was ultimately very good for science fiction shows. They counted anything that was recorded on a VCR as being played back. Science fiction shows and soap operas had what was called a high “VCR contribution” in their rating. So, in essence, they were probably over-counting the genre audience. Surely, not everyone played shows back and-- if they did-- they didn’t play them back in the timeframe advertisers want. They were also skipping commercials like crazy. But, no one was measuring it then.

So, I believe Friday nights were probably better for genre shows with that old Nielsen technology than what it is now that Nielsen is closer to giving advertisers what they want. C3’s aren’t normally published, but they are closest to the Live + Same Day rating these days. So, part of our memories of the “old days” when Scifi shows succeeded on Fridays are tinged by the fact that those rating were “pre-DVR” and “pre-C3”.

The other thing that nags me about Mr. Sumner’s argument is that he is essentially saying that science fiction shows need the cushiest timeslot possible in order to succeed. They can only get decent ratings if they have virtually no competition. I believe the impetus of his POV was how two shows—Stargate: Universe and Sanctuary—got moved from Friday and saw significant drops in their audiences.

Personally, I see that as a sign that people weren’t all that devoted to those shows in the first place. When CSI got moved from Friday, it didn’t lose audience, it gained it.

I think people are making excuses for shows that just aren’t working. Take SGU. It’s first ten episodes ON FRIDAY NIGHT IN THE FALL, averaged 1.5 million PURE LIVE viewers. It added another million time-shifters. The next Spring, in the same timeslot, it was down to 1.1 million Live viewers. But, time-shifters had dropped by about 200,000 too. The subsequent move to Tuesdays didn’t help. 300,000 live viewers dropped the show, but so did another 100,000 time-shifters.

How much does it say about a show when people will drop it so easily?

I don’t mean to pick on this particular show. I actually liked it more than quite a few old-school Stargate fans did. But, one thing lost in the issue of the loss of viewers when it moved was that it really didn’t have a sustainable number of viewers for its cost when it last aired on Friday. The last Friday Adult 18-49 Live + Same Day rating it got was a 0.5. There’s no way that is a profitable rating for a show that looks that expensive.

CW shuttled Smallville to Friday and it did fine and lasted a few more years. Supernatural has survived on Friday as well. We’ll see what happens to Chuck in the Fall. Its fans have been complaining about its heavy Monday competition for years.

Fringe defies the “Friday is great” theory when it moved to Friday and saw a Live + Same Day ratings drop of 24%*. The percentage of 18-49 LIVE viewing declined also. The Friday Fringe had the lowest percentage of live viewing for that demo of all Primetime Broadcast shows for last season.

I don’t think I’ve really answered the question of whether Fridays are good or bad for science fiction TV. If anything, I think the answer is that “it’s complicated.” It may be okay for shows with built-in fanbases to move there and last another season or more. But, Friday’s ability for launching an unproven series may be over. The only new show going into the Friday battle this Fall is Grimm. We’ll see how that does. All the other Friday genre shows are established.

I don’t see Syfy backtracking on its decision about wrestling on Friday. Unless a scripted science fiction show is really cheap, I can’t see one generating a high enough C3 audience on Fridays to be sustainable anymore. And, if it can’t pull an audience on another night, it probably won't work at all.

* Average of all episodes from start of season through week of 5/15.



CLICK TO READ THIS ARTICLE